Embed from Getty Images
Monday, 17 December 2018
Imran Khan's distortion of Jinnah's vision of Pakistan
What happens to a people among whom inbreeding (cousin marriage) is common? After four or five generations, defects begin to appear. Sometimes, it results in total deafness, as in a family who is distantly related to me. At other times, children are born cross-eyed and have to be operated upon to correct the defect, but poor rural Pakistanis are not able to afford such operations, so they have no choice but to bear it. Then there are those who are mentally retarded, like Imran Khan and his vocal information minister Fawad Choudhry. These two make you grateful that your parents and grandparents were not cousins.
Of the two, the info minister is the most stupid. He has said many things to prove that he is a certified moron. Once he said, with a straight face, that helicopters are the cheapest mode of transport, consuming fuel worth Rs. 55 per kilometer (less than a half a dollar). One day he said that it was Porus who defeated Alexander the great, although everyone knows it was the latter who inflicted the greatest defeat in India's history on the hapless Porus. Perhaps the idiot actually believes Porus was the winner, because the battle was fought on the banks of the Jhelum River, where the info minister was born.
Imran Khan himself is mentally retarded. Once he said China has developed trains that run at the speed of light. I strongly suspect that it was only after his recent marriage did he become aware that there was a state of Madina in ancient times. What he doesn't seem to know is that the rulers of Madina were not liars like him, they never made U-turns like he does.
The stupid idiot now says that the late Dr. Israr Ahmed knew what Jinnah's vision of Pakistan was. He apparently doesn't know that this man was a senior member of the Jamat-e-Islami, which bitterly opposed the creation of Pakistan and called its founder "Kafir-e-Azam". If only Imran Kahn had taken a keen interest in history, he would have known this. So I suppose we have no choice but to watch helplessly while this moron does his best to break up the country.
Sunday, 4 November 2018
Not Jinnah's Pakistan
I grew up believing in Jinnah's Pakistan. I thought it would be the greatest country on earth. Jinnah's Pakistan was supposed to be one in which a liberal like me would be free to speak and write his thoughts, even if what he spoke and wrote offended the mighty and powerful people who ruled over the country.
I hasn't turned out that way. Four days back, the country's top court acquitted a poor Christian woman who had been on death row for many years after having been sentenced to death for allegedly committing blasphemy.
No one should have been surprised at the response of those who call themselves the guardians of the country's ideology (an ideology invented by those who opposed the creation of Pakistan).
I'm filled with despair. Everywhere I go, even most educated people I know want the Christian woman to be hanged. I can understand illiterate drivers and security guards having this opinion, but some of the educated ones have studied in elite schools of the country. Without reading the text of the judgement, they believe that the woman is guilty, and those who accused her of blasphemy are truthful.
It hasn't happened overnight. Even though I studied in a missionary school, there were a few even then who told me not to get too friendly with Hindus and Christians. We were told not to drink from the same glass they did. We were told to have separate plates for Christian and Hindu guests on the rare occasions some of them had dinner with us. Four years back I employed a Christian driver whom I allowed to sit on a chair in my office on very hot days. My manager objected (he's Urdu-medium graduate with two degrees), on the grounds that he couldn't even think of drinking from the same glass as the Christian did. Then there was the time a cousin appointed a Hindu clerk. The next day his entire staff threatened to resign if the Hindu was not sacked. This is what Zia did to the country, he made most of us so intolerant that we cannot bear to even talk to those of other faiths.
Even though the fanatics openly called the army chief Bajwa an infidel, even though they asked for the immediate execution of the three judges and even though they demanded the overthrow of the civilian government, no action was taken. Ultimately, the government of Imran Khan capitulated, in what can only be called a shameless surrender (very much like the surrender of East Pakistan to the enemy in 1971).
And in the midst of all this, with both the army and the police acting like impotent cowards, one man proved that the loonies on the streets can be defeated. After being stranded on the highway for hours, he lost his temper, took out his klashnikov, and indulged in aerial firing. The mob dispersed immediately. The army chief should see the video of this incident instead of saying that he can't fire upon his own people. Apparently, in his opinion, the protesting Pathans in the north are not Pakistanis. He should remember that in 1971, Bengalis were not considered true Pakistanis, and that mindset ultimately led to the dismemberment of the country. The country is on the road to another break-up.
No one should have been surprised at the response of those who call themselves the guardians of the country's ideology (an ideology invented by those who opposed the creation of Pakistan).
I'm filled with despair. Everywhere I go, even most educated people I know want the Christian woman to be hanged. I can understand illiterate drivers and security guards having this opinion, but some of the educated ones have studied in elite schools of the country. Without reading the text of the judgement, they believe that the woman is guilty, and those who accused her of blasphemy are truthful.
It hasn't happened overnight. Even though I studied in a missionary school, there were a few even then who told me not to get too friendly with Hindus and Christians. We were told not to drink from the same glass they did. We were told to have separate plates for Christian and Hindu guests on the rare occasions some of them had dinner with us. Four years back I employed a Christian driver whom I allowed to sit on a chair in my office on very hot days. My manager objected (he's Urdu-medium graduate with two degrees), on the grounds that he couldn't even think of drinking from the same glass as the Christian did. Then there was the time a cousin appointed a Hindu clerk. The next day his entire staff threatened to resign if the Hindu was not sacked. This is what Zia did to the country, he made most of us so intolerant that we cannot bear to even talk to those of other faiths.
Even though the fanatics openly called the army chief Bajwa an infidel, even though they asked for the immediate execution of the three judges and even though they demanded the overthrow of the civilian government, no action was taken. Ultimately, the government of Imran Khan capitulated, in what can only be called a shameless surrender (very much like the surrender of East Pakistan to the enemy in 1971).
And in the midst of all this, with both the army and the police acting like impotent cowards, one man proved that the loonies on the streets can be defeated. After being stranded on the highway for hours, he lost his temper, took out his klashnikov, and indulged in aerial firing. The mob dispersed immediately. The army chief should see the video of this incident instead of saying that he can't fire upon his own people. Apparently, in his opinion, the protesting Pathans in the north are not Pakistanis. He should remember that in 1971, Bengalis were not considered true Pakistanis, and that mindset ultimately led to the dismemberment of the country. The country is on the road to another break-up.
Sunday, 9 September 2018
Jinnah's so-called joint defence pact offer to India
‘Defence pact’
Published in Dawn on September 9th, 2018
THIS is with reference to the letter ‘Quaid on Indo-Pak joint
defence’ (Sept 6). As far as I know, Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah never
made any such offer to India.
It
would have made no sense since Pakistan and India were already involved in
hostilities at the time, and there was no threat to either country from any
other power.
It
was Ayub Khan who offered a joint defence pact to India. Mohtarma Fatima Jinnah
was the most vocal critic of this offer.
If
the Quaid had ever made a joint defence offer to India, she would not have
opposed Ayub Khan in this matter.
Shakir
Lakhani
Karachi
https://www.dawn.com/news/1431843/defence-pact
Sunday, 29 April 2018
Which came first, Independence or the Kashmir dispute?
One popular misconception among Pakistanis (and many Indians, for that matter) is that Britain deliberately divided the subcontinent. Nothing could be further from the truth. Britain's viceroy Mountbatten tried his best to convince Mr. Jinnah that Pakistan would never be able to survive. Even Nehru said, "Let them have their Pakistan, in six months they'll be back, begging to be taken back into India". He had been deceived by the propaganda of his own advisers, much like today, when rabid Hindu Indians are convinced that Pakistan would never have survived without foreign aid.
Today's generation, of course, does not know much of history, except the doctored version taught in schools (of both countries). So they do not know that before the two countries became independent, and the British became convinced that it could not prevent Pakistan from happening, they handed over Gurdaspur (which rightfully belonged to Pakistan) to India. Even the D.C. of Gurdaspur was shocked, because he had raised Pakistan's flag on 15 August 1947. This, by the way, is another thing those Pakistanis born after 1947 don't know, that for the first two or three years after 1947, Independence Day was celebrated on August 15.
So, it is obvious that the Kashmir dispute was planned before the two countries became independent, to ensure that there would be no peace between the two countries and they would always be at war with each other.
Sunday, 20 August 2017
If Jinnah could see Pakistan today, what would he say?
Published in the Express Tribune blogs on August 20, 2017
If Muhammad Ali Jinnah came back from the grave and saw the
sorry state of the country he
had created, what would he say?
He would be shocked to see that the Pakistan of 1947 had
been broken
into two, with East Pakistan (where his beloved Muslim
League was founded) no longer a part of Pakistan.
He would see a country on the brink of an economic collapse,
with the dollar (which was equal to the rupee in value in 1947) now
worth Rs107.
He would see fruits
and other edibles from New Zealand and other countries selling at prices beyond
the reach of
the common man in a land which once had the potential of being the granary of
Asia.
He would see an innocent nine-year-old
child killed by
vehicles in a large rally led by a discredited politician. Moreover, he would
see the poor victim being labelled a “martyr” for democracy by the heartless
beasts who were responsible for his death.
He would be amazed to
hear calls for putting the Constitution under abeyance, he who was the greatest
constitutional lawyer of his times.
The magnitude
of corruption would
have shocked him, as he had said time and again that it was necessary
to eliminate corruption for the new country to progress.
He
would be shocked to see the hooliganism of the rowdy and undisciplined lawyers
who attack judges.
He would be appalled
to see
the poverty of
millions of Pakistanis who do not earn enough to feed their families and who
desperately try to survive on less than a hundred rupees a day.
It would break his
heart to see the state
of our schools,
where most teachers are absent except on the days when they turn up to collect
their salaries.
And he would be
filled with horror at the state
of our hospitals,
with the poor waiting in long lines to be attended to by ill-trained doctors,
while our corrupt leaders rush abroad to get treated for the slightest of
ailments.
He
would see the huge palaces and mansions of the rich and the corrupt, but with
beggars streaming our streets and roads, and he would be filled with despair.
He would see that
those who opposed the creation of Pakistan (and who
called him “Kafir-e-Azam”)
are now the guardians of its ideology (as defined by them). As a result,
intolerance is so high that even he would not be considered by such people to
be a Muslim.
He would see
Christians and other minorities being routinely charged with
blasphemy (and
being burnt alive). He would see Muslims being killed because their beliefs are
different from those of their killers, who believe that only they are true
Muslims.
He would
remember what
he had told the
citizens of the country he had created:
“You are free; you are free to go to your temples. You are free
to go to your mosques or to any other places of worship in this State of
Pakistan. You may belong to any religion, caste or creed—that has nothing to do
with the business of the state.”
He would see girls as
young as 11-years-old being married off to men old enough to be their
grandfathers. The jirga system, the punishment of women for the sins of
their male relatives, helpless women being stripped naked, gang-raped and made
to walk in public would have shocked him to no end.
He would see rampant
loot and plunder of the country, with shameless members of provincial ruling
parties passing legislations to
prevent the National
Accountability Bureau (NAB) from investigating their corruption.
And he would see the
city of his birth (Karachi) sinking under heaps of garbage and its residents
being slowly poisoned by air and water
pollution.
And
Jinnah would have wept because present-day Pakistan is so utterly and so
horribly different from the country he had wanted it to be.
https://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/55211/if-jinnah-could-see-pakistan-today-what-would-he-say/
Saturday, 22 July 2017
Quaid’s mausoleum may soon be replaced by high-rises, and we’re not doing anything about it
Published in The Express Tribune blog on July 21, 2017
They decided to demolish
the mausoleum and use the land to make many high rise residential and
commercial buildings on it.
I suppose it shouldn’t come as a surprise that the present Sindh government, like its predecessors, is also
selling whatever open
land is left in Karachi to interested developers.
I’m referring to the most recent scandal, the selling
of 30 acres of land meant for the Horticultural Society to
the builders’ mafia at a price which is about 1% of its actual value. I wonder
if they have ever thought of the fact that one day, all the open
spaces in Karachi will be gobbled
up and replaced with shopping malls and commercial plazas, and they will
have nothing left to sell.
So if a man is struck on the head today in an accident, goes
into a coma and wakes up about 30 years later (in 2050), what will he see when
he drives
around the city?
The first thing he will note is that all the parks
have disappeared, the National Stadium has been replaced with 10 very tall
residential buildings, and the Safari Park and the zoo no longer exist. But he
is shocked when he sees that the Quaid-e-Azam’s mausoleum has vanished and has been
replaced by 30 high
rise shopping malls.
“What’s this?” he asks his
grandson, “Where is Jinnah’s tomb? It used to be here.”
“No, it was always in Thatta,”
says the young man.
“It was right here!” The old man
insists.
The grandson whips out his smart phone and Googles ‘Jinnah’s
tomb’ and shows him the result. The old man sees that it’s the same
structure that used to be in Karachi, but Google clearly states that it
is in
Thatta. His eyes are full of tears and he is determined to get to the
bottom of the mystery.
Over the next few days, he
starts looking for those he used to know before his accident, his juniors and
assistants who had been working in the Sindh secretariat before his accident.
He bumps into one of them who retired 20 years back and is there to collect his
monthly pension. The man is surprised to see him.
Over a
cup of tea, he agrees to reveal everything he knows but begs the old
man not to say anything about it to anyone, as it is a crime to even talk about
it.
“It happened about 25 years ago, when the rulers began running
out of money as there was no
land available to sell to builders in order to construct
more buildings. So they decided to demolish the mausoleum and use the land
to make many high rise residential and commercial buildings on it. They got
the mazaar (mausoleum)
declared a dangerous building and got it demolished. It
took only three days for the structure to crumble and another three days for
the rubble to be shifted to Thatta. I remember they used a thousand trucks to
do it.”
“But what about the media and the social
society activists?” the old man asks. “Surely they would have objected?”
“Oh, they were told another
mausoleum would be built in its place, so they were pacified. They knew that it
had taken 25 years to build the original structure, so they came to terms
with the idea that it would take many years for the new structure to come up.
In the meantime, the rulers got an identical monument constructed in Thatta.
Then, they went on to state that this was the original Quaid’s mazaar in school textbooks. It reminded me
of the time when they printed that the Quaid’s birthplace was in Jhirruck, near
Thatta in some other textbook.”
“But what about those who lived in other cities?” the old man
asks. “What about the government in Islamabad?
Surely they would have known what was going on.”
“Everyone has a price. Of those 30 buildings, one was given to
the rulers in Islamabad, another to those in Karachi, hundreds of shops and
apartments were gifted to government
employees, media
persons and all those who asked awkward questions. Soon it was
made a crime for anyone to talk about the scandal and a
whole new generation has grown up believing that the great leader’s last
resting place is in Thatta.”
So how should I end?
Seeing how shameless and unscrupulous Karachi’s
rulers are, I am sure the aforementioned narrative is entirely
possible that the Quaid’s mausoleum will be pulled down one day and all the
land will be sold to the
builders’ mafia in order to construct more buildings.
Engineer, former visiting lecturer at NED Engineering College,
industrialist, associated with petroleum/chemical industries for many years.
Loves writing, and (in the opinion of most of those who know him), mentally
unbalanced. He tweets @shakirlakhani (twitter.com/shakirlakhani
Saturday, 20 May 2017
If Jinnah never asked Ruttie to change her name to Maryam, why did you, Pakistan?
Published in The Express Tribune blogs on May 19, 2017
Rattanbai "Ruttie" Petit.
Those of us who were born
before Partition know that Muhammad Ali Jinnah could not speak Urdu, except perhaps a few broken sentences. His speeches
were always in English, sometimes with a translator to make the crowds
understand what he was saying. But sometime in the 1980s, the government dubbed all his speeches in Urdu, apparently under pressure from those
who thought a highly westernised Jinnah would make today’s youth doubt that he
wanted an Islamic state.
One result of this is that an entire generation of Pakistanis
have grown up believing that
Jinnah was fluent in Urdu, and always dressed in a sherwani instead of the
western clothes he always wore. Even our currency notes show him wearing a
sherwani, which he donned on very few occasions after independence.
This
is, of course, all due to the fear among the so-called defenders of the
country’s ideology that somehow our people will stop believing that the
country’s founder looked, dressed and spoke like an Englishman. Of course,
these same defenders of the country’s ideology belong to those religious
parties which strenuously opposed the creation of Pakistan and even used to call Mr
Jinnah ‘Kafir
e Azam’. Fortunately, Mr Jinnah was always clean-shaven, but that will not deter these
elements from pasting a beard on his photos anytime soon, seeing how rapidly
the country’s youth is being radicalised.
But these hardliners were not satisfied with just changing the
image of the country’s founder. They saw that his wife, Ruttie Jinnah, was
highly westernised as well. Hence they thought of making her appear as a pious
Muslim and the first thing they did was change her name to Maryam.
This
was supposed to have happened after her conversion to Islam at the time of her
marriage to Jinnah. They thought if young people today knew that Jinnah did not
get his wife’s name changed to a Muslim name at the time of their marriage,
they would think he could not have been a staunch Muslim. So they got this
piece of disinformation (about Ruttie’s name being changed to Maryam) inserted in Wikipedia and our school textbooks, again making
a whole generation of Pakistanis believing another lie.
For those who may not
know, the name change has to be done before marriage, so that the new name is recorded in the marriage documents. In the 1960s,
a Muslim woman married the scion of a well-known Hindu family in Karachi.
Before the marriage was solemnised, the man was converted and given a Muslim
name, after which the nikkah was performed. In Ruttie’s case, this was not
necessary because her name (meaning jewel) was common amongst Gujrati Muslims of
those times.
But apparently, our ideologues did
not know this, and decided to give her what they thought was a good Muslim
name. And because she already had a Muslim name, Mr Jinnah did not think it
necessary to ask her to change her name when he married her. Which is why in
his marriage certificate, the name of the bride is stated to be Ratanbai.
For
the record, this changing of Ruttie’s name has not been mentioned in any
newspaper or periodical published at the time, neither has it been verified or
authenticated by any credible source. Moreover, she always signed her letters “Ruttie”, and in one of her letters
which she wrote to Jinnah four months before her death, she ends with the
words,
“Darling
goodnight and goodbye. Ruttie”
Finally, the most authentic
piece of evidence that Ruttie did not change her name is her tombstone, which
has the name Ratanbai engraved on it. Jinnah frequently visited her grave and
the last time he did so was just before the Partition(19 years after her death). Surely he would
have gotten the name on the tombstone changed to Maryam if that was her name.
The fact that he did not do so proves that there was no change of name, and his
wife lived and died as Ruttie Jinnah.
Engineer, former
visiting lecturer at NED Engineering College, industrialist, associated with
petroleum/chemical industries for many years. Loves writing, and (in the
opinion of most of those who know him), mentally unbalanced. He tweets
@shakirlakhani (twitter.com/shakirlakhani)
https://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/49959/if-jinnah-never-asked-ruttie-to-change-her-name-to-maryam-why-did-you-pakistan/
Friday, 22 April 2016
Sorry, Mr Jinnah, we had to ruin your beloved Pakistan
Published in The Express Tribune blogs o April 20, 2016
You wanted Pakistan to be a
state where we would be free; free to go to our mosques, temples and churches,
but today it is a country where many are free to bomb
places of worship. You said there would be no difference between
Hindus, Christians and Muslims, but today Pakistan’s Muslims
are killing each other (as
well as Hindus and Christians) because they cannot tolerate those whose beliefs
are different from theirs.
Your Pakistan would have been a
model democracy, but 10 years after your death, a
military dictator took
over the reins of the country, and we hailed him as a saviour. After the first
free and fair elections
in 1970, we
watched helplessly as a demagogue refused to accept the winner of the polls as
prime minister, which led to the dismemberment of your beloved country. Later, other
dictators came
and did their best to damage the country you created.
You created Pakistan because
you feared that Muslims would have no rights in a Hindu-dominated India. But
today, the country is ruled not by Hindus, but by a feudal
class which
considers itself above the law and flagrantly refuses
to pay its due
share of taxes (but decides how much tax honest taxpayers should pay).
When you were dying, Mr Jinnah,
your doctors advised you to go to London for treatment, but you refused because
your country was poor and because you loved its people. Today, Mr Jinnah, every
member of parliament is allowed
to go abroad for
medical treatment for the slightest of ailments (like constipation and
diarrhoea). You did not take a salary even though you were working day and night,
but today our politicians have looted
the country and
bought palaces in foreign countries, and we can do nothing about it.
You’ll be shocked to hear, Mr
Jinnah, that the kind of people who called you ‘Kafir-e-Azam’ (the great infidel) have appointed
themselves guardians of Pakistan’s ideology (even though they bitterly opposed
the creation of Pakistan). These men thought you should be portrayed in their
image, so they have dubbed your speeches in Urdu, a language which you could
not speak. They changed the name of your wife to Maryam, even though your
marriage certificate and her tombstone say her name is Rattan
Bai. Some of them even changed the place of your birth to an
obscure town in Sindh, even though you yourself said on many occasions that you
were born in Karachi. We won’t be surprised if in future they remove all your
portraits and show you as a heavily bearded man in an attempt to prove that you
were like them.
In today’s Pakistan, Mr Jinnah,
only one per cent of the population pays
income tax. There are regions which refuse to pay customs duty and
taxes on smuggled cars, the country’s industries are on the verge of collapse
due to rampant smuggling, and the government cannot impose its writ and recover
taxes from such elements (because practically everyone in the government is
highly corrupt). The streets of your beloved Karachi
are not safe, and we consider it a miracle if we arrive home safely every
evening without being mugged
or robbed (even though, as you said, the first duty of every government
is the maintenance of law and order).
You said that no nation can
progress if its women don’t work, yet today the Pakistani working woman is not
safe. The mullahs say her place is in the home and she has to bear as many
children as she can. And if, God forbid, she
is raped (something
that happens every day), she can be charged with adultery if she goes to the
police, as she can’t produce four male witnesses to the crime. In fact, one
religious leader even advised rape victims to remain
silent and say nothing (because in his version of the true religion,
that is what has been ordained).
We do
not know if it is true that you called Pakistan the greatest blunder of your
life, as you lay dying in Karachi, but over the years we have done our best to
make it come true.
Shakir Lakhani
https://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/33976/sorry-mr-jinnah-we-had-to-ruin-your-beloved-pakistan/
Tuesday, 14 October 2014
You can't compare Imran with Jinnah!
Imran and Jinnah
Published in Daily Times on October 14, 2014
Sir: With reference to the article
“Imran Khan is no Jinnah” (Daily Times, October 10, 2014), I’m amazed that the
writer could even think of comparing a power-hungry person like our
ex-cricketer Imran Khan with the founder of our nation, Jinnah. If at all there
is a need to compare this Taliban sympathiser to any leader; it should be
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who was so eager to become the prime minister of the
country that he refused to acknowledge the winner of the 1970s elections and to
hand over power to Mujeebur Rehman. We know what happened as a result of this
stubborn and arrogant attitude; the country was dismembered. Imran Khan’s
attitude is similar to Bhutto’s. The country be damned as long as he gets to be
the prime minister.
SHAKIR LAKHANI
Karachi
Saturday, 5 July 2014
The houses that Jinnah built
Published in Daily Times on July 5, 2014
Sir: This is with reference to the
article “The houses that Jinnah built” (Daily Times, June 17, 2014), Dr Ishtiaq
Ahmed says, “It is possible that Jinnah simply dissociated himself from
Ismailism without formally abjuring that creed.” The fact is that the followers
of the Aga Khan were bound to marry within the community. Any Aga Khani Ismaili
marrying a non-member of the sect was expelled (even though the Quaid was a
good friend of the then Aga Khan, who was incidentally the first president of
the All-India Muslim League). Mr Jinnah was then invited by both Sunni Khojas
as well as the Khoja Ishna Asharis to join them. For reasons best known to
Jinnah, he chose the latter community.
SHAKIR
LAKHANI
Karachi
Wednesday, 20 March 2013
Mr. Jinnah's Pakistan
Published in The Express Tribune on March 21, 2013.
KARACHI: This is
with reference to the article “Jinnah’s Pakistan” by Yaqoob Khan Bangash (March
18). As the writer has stated, Mr Jinnah indeed wanted a country based on
Islamic principles, but his interpretation of Islam did not entail extremists
being allowed to run the country. In one of his speeches, he clearly stated, “
… Pakistan is not going to be a theocratic state to be ruled by priests with a
divine mission …” He would certainly have disagreed with the Taliban’s version
of Islam or even its interpretation by our religious leaders.
Mr Jinnah created Pakistan solely
because he feared that in an undivided India, Muslims would always be dominated
by the majority (Hindus) and could eventually lose their identity. In fact, in
the view of religious scholars like Maulana Abul Ala Maududi, Mr Jinnah was so
liberal and secular that the name Kafir-e-Azam was coined for him. In his first
cabinet, there was a Hindu minister. The first foreign minister, Sir Zafrullah
Khan, was an Ahmadi (something which religious leaders even in those days could
never have tolerated had they been in power). As far as the dismissal of Dr
Khan’s government is concerned, the decision was taken by the cabinet headed by
the prime minister. Mr Jinnah was too sick at the time to even be consulted
over such a move.
Shakir Lakhani
https://tribune.com.pk/story/523785/jinnahs-pakistan-2/
Tuesday, 30 June 2009
Anyone named Jinnah can fool the government
Published in Dawn on July 2, 2009
According to a news item in DAWN (30th June), someone named Aslam Jinnah claiming to be Mr. Jinnah’s great grandson said that he is satisfied with the facilities and help provided to him by the government. I wonder why the government employs nincompoops who don’t even know the meaning of “great grandson” (leave alone “grandson”). The Quaid had only one child (Dina Wadia) whose son Nusli Wadia (the only grandson of Mr. Jinnah) lives in India. So the Quaid’s great grandson would be Mr. Wadia’s son and would bear the surname “Wadia” instead of “Jinnah”. Yet without asking the so-called great grandson (Aslam Jinnah) to prove his credentials, the government has provided him with a house, a car and Rs. 50,000 per month of public money. The bureaucrats who approved these payments and facilities should be made to pay for them from their own pockets. This is the only way they will learn to be careful if in future someone with the surname “Jinnah” turns up in Islamabad and asks for financial help.
SHAKIR LAKHANI
Friday, 1 May 2009
Jinnah's grandsons
Quaid’s great grandson
Published in Dawn on June 20, 2006
THIS is with reference to the news item “Assassins of Quaid’s great grandson convicted” (June 17). By definition, a great grandson is the son of a grandson. Mr Jinnah had only one child (Dina Wadia) whose son (Neville Wadia) is living in India. Mr Wadia’s son would, therefore, be the Quaid’s great grandson. Consequently, Mr Jinnah’s great grandson would have the surname Wadia, and not Jinnah. The late Sikander Jinnah was, therefore, not the great grandson of the Quaid.
SHAKIR LAKHANI
Karachi
Monday, 12 January 2009
Jinnah & Jherruck
Published in The News January 13, 2009
This is with reference to an article "Jinnah was born here" in published in your newspaper on Jan 11. Even though Jinnah himself said that his birthplace was Karachi and Fatima Jinnah said that he was born in Kharadar (in Karachi), there are people who still think otherwise. If, as the writer claims, Jinnah's maternal grandparents were from Jherruk, and his mother went there to give birth, it follows that she (and therefore Mr Jinnah) should have been able to speak Sindhi. But it is well-known that the Quaid could speak only two languages (English and Gujarati). This can be confirmed by those who had close contact with him (like Mr Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada).
I am reminded of a similar controversy regarding Mr L K Advani (whose place of birth was said to be Advani Mohalla in Hyderabad). When he came to Karachi a couple of years ago, he visited the house in which he was born (near Quaid's mazar in Karachi). This was shown on most TV channels. Despite this, I know people in Hyderabad who believe that he was born in a house in Advani Mohalla in Hyderabad. And so it was with the founder of the nation: just because someone inserted a piece of disinformation in a Sindhi textbook in the early years after partition, thousands of people in the rural areas of the province would continue to believe that Jherruk was his birthplace. Under such circumstances, I won't be surprised if someone in future claims that the Quaid is buried in a tomb somewhere in Jherruk (and not in the mausoleum in Karachi). After all, anything is possible in Pakistan.
Shakir Lakhani
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
